Certainly, by providing the financial resources needed by partnerships and intermediary organizations. This is the most obvious of the ways in which funders contribute. Many groups rely strongly if not completely on funding from grantmakers or the government to survive. However, this important contribution is only one way in which grantmakers and governmental agencies can contribute to a collaborative partnership.
They can also foster community work in the following ways:. With an understanding of all of these parts, let's look at how these partners can work together to improve their communities. The bottom line? There isn't a day when community work ends. In a healthy community, working together for the good of the community is a constant part of everyone's lives.
With these ideas in mind, let's look at the individual parts of this logic model or theory of action. The Future of the Public's Health in the 21st Century. The first step is understanding the context, or the community conditions, in which people act. The context is influenced by many things, such as:. Within this context, people may come together to identify issues that matter to them , such as transportation, job opportunities, affordable housing, or substance abuse prevention, to give just a few examples.
They may gather and review community-level indicators to help understand markers for important measures in the community. For example, records of assaults at school are one community-level indicator of violence in the community; nighttime single-vehicle car crashes can be used as an indicator for substance abuse in a community.
Later in the life of the community group, these can serve as benchmarks for detecting whether or not they are making progress on their goals. For example, they can look at the level of violence and see if it has decreased since implementation of prevention strategies. With an understanding of the context, the group can move forward with planning.
Collaborative planning is a critical and ongoing task that brings together people and organizations with different experiences and resources. Together, they clarify or develop a vision, mission, objectives, strategies, and action steps for bringing about changes in the community.
How can a community organization overcome any potential opposition? View this Troubleshooting Guide for different responses a group might make , depending on its particular situation. The goal of the action plan is to bring about community and system changes. By community change , we mean developing a new program or modifying an existing one , bringing about a change in policy , or adjusting a practice related to the group's mission.
System changes are similar to community changes, but take place on a broader level. A business might implement its child-friendly practices throughout its operations nationally. Another example is a change in grantmaking policy to award cash incentives to grantees that reach their objectives. When these community and system changes occur, they should, taken together, change the environment in which a person behaves. What are risk and protective factors? They are aspects of a person's environment or personal features that make it more likely risk factors or less likely protective factors that she will develop a given problem.
Often, risk and protective factors can be considered flip sides of the same coin. For example, if drugs are readily available in your community, then easy accessibility is a risk factor. If they are very difficult to find, then that lack of drugs is a protective factor.
The intended effect of environmental change is widespread behavior change of large numbers of people in the community. Improvements in more distant outcomes, such as reducing violence or increasing employment rates and family incomes, are the ultimate goals of collaborative partnerships.
As we discussed earlier in this section, data on community-level indicators can help you determine just how much progress you have made towards your goals. Information to see if efforts are working in different areas can be organized together in an annual community "report card.
Before we go on, it may be helpful to look again at this process as a whole. Remember, this process is an interactive and continuous cycle. In all the different parts of our lives, some things work, and others don't. Why is that? Think for a moment about a school. Students have the same framework to work in each grade has the same learning objectives, for example.
Still, some students and schools succeed and others fail. What causes that difference? It's probably a combination of things -- support at home, a good teacher, and good or not so good materials to use. Quite simply, within a framework that almost all students have, different events often mean the difference between success and failure. In the last few paragraphs, you have seen what we believe to be a workable model for building healthier communities.
But like that school, what you've read is just a framework. And different events that happen within the framework make it more or less likely that a community group will succeed. For improving the health and development of a community, we have found seven features that seem to be very important in determining whether a community effort fails or succeeds. In our research, each of the following "factors" has been related to the rate of community change. We'll look at them one by one.
Having a targeted mission is one of the most important factors in whether or not a community group is effective. A mission statement is your organization's statement of purpose ; it tells what the organization is going to do and why.
For example, an organization's mission might be: "Our mission is to decrease adolescent pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases in Dade County through a community-wide effort which will provide education and support to young people and their families. Action planning means identifying specific changes in the community or broader system, and action steps to bring them about. During action planning, community partnerships identify:.
When partnerships develop a plan of action , they are more successful bringing about community change and improvement. Involving competent leaders with a clear vision helps change to occur more rapidly. Such leaders see community partnerships as a way to mobilize the community, draw out people's strengths, and celebrate members' accomplishments. These leaders are likely to head effective collaborative partnerships. The downside of this, of course, is that when such leaders leave an organization, groups accomplishments often suffer.
Finding a way to ease transitions and develop leadership within the group is an important factor in having groups that have long, successful lives. One thing that is clear is the need for people who act as catalysts--community mobilizers who will really get things going in the community.
They are the ones who will start the ball rolling on the actions that the group decides to do. By hiring or recruiting community mobilizers, groups consistently make more changes happen. To know whether a community group's efforts are making a difference, it is important that the group documents efforts and results.
Such information about the group's accomplishments should be used to improve the group's ongoing efforts. Documentation should occur for intermediate outcomes, such as community and system changes. Tracking these changes, as well as the groups' longer-term goals, can help the collaborative partnerships understand, celebrate, and improve their overall efforts.
Good leaders work to attract competent people with skills that complement those of other people in the organization. By doing so, team members grow and become stronger in their work. Outside help, which may take the form of technical assistance, can be a breath of fresh air for your organization. That's because the core competencies necessary for community organizations often transcend the variety of targeted missions and specialties people work in.
For example, action planning will be important to community work on environmental advocacy, child abuse, mental health, or almost any other community issue. The goal of technical assistance should always be the same: to build the community's ability to take care of the things that matter to its members. This website is an example of this kind of assistance. The Community Tool Box contains over sections that can support technical assistance efforts.
Finally, grantmakers and governmental agencies can help those they support by clearly stating and rewarding desired results. For example, a foundation in Kansas U. The result was that the amount of community change increased dramatically.
This same grantmaker now uses bonus grants to encourage progress. Throughout this section, we have talked about the three groups who are the important players in collaborative partnerships: local members of state and community partnerships, support organizations, and grantmakers and governmental agencies.
Much of the decision-making and work must happen within the communities themselves. However, all of these groups can work together and help create conditions under which it is more likely that community efforts will be successful. Based on the model we discussed above, we propose ten specific recommendations to assist people who are trying to change their communities for the better.
Working with community partnerships, grantmakers and governmental agencies should develop a social marketing plan to promote involvement in community work.
Develop partnerships where people can work together to improve their community. Provide information to help focus efforts on issues with the greatest effect on community health and development. Provide investments in collaborative partnerships that are large enough and last long enough to make a difference. Document the process of community and system change to improve community work. Develop collaborative partnerships to increase the support for people working to improve their communities.
Future research should help understand and improve the factors that affect community health and development. A healthy community is a form of living democracy: people working together to address what matters to them.
As citizens, we have a duty to shape the basic conditions that affect our lives with others in transforming communities, we are guided by shared values and principles that bind us in common purpose.
Building healthier communities blends the local and the universal, the particular and broader contexts. Such efforts are grounded locally: the family, the neighborhood, and other familiar communities. To be effective, however, we must also bring diverse groups of people and organizations together to transform the broader conditions that affect local work.
This requires courage, doubt, and faith: the courage to trust those outside our immediate experience, the doubt to question what is, and the faith to believe that together, we will make a difference. The work of building healthier communities takes time: our time, that of our children, and that of our children's children. A Jewish proverb counsels: "You are not bound to finish the work, but neither are you free to give it up.
Emerging Action Principles for Designing and Planning Community Change is from Community Science and shares what science and practice have taught us about strengthening community.
In his speech, he describes the role of community psychology in treating addiction. March, This Community Tool Box section is an edited version of the following invited paper and book chapter :.
Fawcett, S. Building Healthy Communities. Wichita, KS. Tarlov, A. Society and Population Health. Aguirre, M. Community-based approaches for the prevention of alcohol,tobacco, and other drug use. Annual Review of Public Health , 17, Altman, D. Public health advocacy: Creating community change to improve health. Bernstein, J. Has income inequality stopped growing? Monthly Labor Review, 12 , Brofenbrenner, U. The state of Americans: This generation and the next. Carroll, J.
Neighborhoods and citizenship. November 15, Citrin, T. Topics for our times: Public health--community or commodity? Reflections on Healthy Communities. American Journal of Public Health , 88 3 , Some values guiding community research and action.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, Some lessons on community organization and change. In Rothman, J. Itasca, IL:F. Peacock Publishers. Using empowerment theory to support community initiatives for health and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23 5 , Evaluating community coalitions for the prevention of substance abuse: The case of Project Freedom.
Health Education and Behavior, 24 6 , Evaluating community initiatives for health and development. Rootman, McQueen, D. Evaluating health promotion approaches. Feinstein, J. The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: A review of the literature. Milbank Quarterly, 71, Francisco, V. A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community coalitions. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice , 8 3 , Fukuyama, F. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity.
Goodman, R. An initial attempt at identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Education and Behavior. Green, L. Health promotion planning: An educational and environmental approach , 2nd ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Hawkins, D. Communities that care. Herrnstein, R. The bell curve: Intelligence and class in American life. Himmelman, A. Communities working collaboratively for a change. Institute of Medicine. The future of public health. Washington, D. Improving health in the community: A role for performance monitoring. Kaplan, G. Income inequality and mortality in the United States.
British Medical Journal, , Kawachi, I. Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 87 9 , Kehrer, B.
Impact of income maintenance on low birthweight: Evidence from the Gary experiment. Journal of Human Resources, 14 , Kretzman, J. Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets.
Lappe, F. The quickening of America: Rebuilding our nation, remaking our lives. Marmot, M. The Lancet, 8 , Orfield, M. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Paine, A. Replicating a community-based initiative for the prevention of adolescent pregnancy: From South Carolina to Kansas. Family and Community Health, 19 1 , Putnam, R.
Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy , 6 1 , Raudenbusch, S. Toward a science of ecological assessment: A model for the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Rothman, J. Reflections on community organization: Enduring themes and critical issues. Itasca, IL: F. Schorr, L. Common purpose: Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America. World Health Organization.
Ottawa charter for health promotion. Raymond 1,2 and Jen Cleary 3. ABSTRACT This study presents a self-assessment tool and process that facilitate community capacity building and social learning for natural resource management. The tool and process provide opportunities for rural landholders and project teams both to self-assess their capacity to plan and deliver natural resource management NRM programs and to reflect on their capacities relative to other organizations and institutions that operate in their region.
Results indicate that participants representing local, organizational, and institutional tiers of government were able to arrive at a group consensus position on the strength, importance, and confidence of a variety of capacities for NRM categorized broadly as human, social, physical, and financial.
During the process, participants learned a lot about their current capacity as well as capacity needs. Broad conclusions are discussed with reference to the iterative process for assessing and reflecting on community capacity. Key words: adaptive capacity; co-management; community capacity; environmental management; participatory action research.
If accepted for publication, your response will be hyperlinked to the article.
0コメント